After rewriting and keeping the dynamics of the writing same, our tool passes it through a plagiarism checker. This ensures that the legal standard of plagiarism is maintained after rewriting the article. After all this process, a final rewritten form is presented to you. All this process may require some time depending upon the nature and length of the article to be rewritten.

While these recommendations give you some general guidelines as to what settings you want to use in these more popular situations, don’t be afraid to customize according to your needs. For instance, if your Tier 1 will build only just a few links, you can set the 1st input to “Very Readable” or even “Extremely Readable” as WordAI will still produce unique content even if only a few versions.
Very Readable Content – for this one they recommend setting the 1st input to “Very Readable” and allowing both sentence rewriting and paragraph editing (2nd and 3rd input), but disallowing automatic paragraph spinning (the 4th input). Keep in mind that this type of spinning will generate much less unique versions of your content as less synonyms will be used for the words.
!function(e){function n(t){if(r[t])return r[t].exports;var i=r[t]={i:t,l:!1,exports:{}};return e[t].call(i.exports,i,i.exports,n),i.l=!0,i.exports}var t=window.webpackJsonp;window.webpackJsonp=function(n,r,o){for(var s,a,l=0,u=[];l1)for(var t=1;td)return!1;if(p>f)return!1;var e=window.require.hasModule("shared/browser")&&window.require("shared/browser");return!e||!e.opera}function a(){var e="";return"quora.com"==window.Q.subdomainSuffix&&(e+=[window.location.protocol,"//log.quora.com"].join("")),e+="/ajax/log_errors_3RD_PARTY_POST"}function l(){var e=o(h);h=[],0!==e.length&&c(a(),{revision:window.Q.revision,errors:JSON.stringify(e)})}var u=t("./third_party/tracekit.js"),c=t("./shared/basicrpc.js").rpc;u.remoteFetching=!1,u.collectWindowErrors=!0,u.report.subscribe(r);var f=10,d=window.Q&&window.Q.errorSamplingRate||1,h=[],p=0,m=i(l,1e3),w=window.console&&!(window.NODE_JS&&window.UNIT_TEST);n.report=function(e){try{w&&console.error(e.stack||e),u.report(e)}catch(e){}};var y=function(e,n,t){r({name:n,message:t,source:e,stack:u.computeStackTrace.ofCaller().stack||[]}),w&&console.error(t)};n.logJsError=y.bind(null,"js"),n.logMobileJsError=y.bind(null,"mobile_js")},"./shared/globals.js":function(e,n,t){var r=t("./shared/links.js");(window.Q=window.Q||{}).openUrl=function(e,n){var t=e.href;return r.linkClicked(t,n),window.open(t).opener=null,!1}},"./shared/links.js":function(e,n){var t=[];n.onLinkClick=function(e){t.push(e)},n.linkClicked=function(e,n){for(var r=0;r>>0;if("function"!=typeof e)throw new TypeError;for(arguments.length>1&&(t=n),r=0;r>>0,r=arguments.length>=2?arguments[1]:void 0,i=0;i>>0;if(0===i)return-1;var o=+n||0;if(Math.abs(o)===Infinity&&(o=0),o>=i)return-1;for(t=Math.max(o>=0?o:i-Math.abs(o),0);t>>0;if("function"!=typeof e)throw new TypeError(e+" is not a function");for(arguments.length>1&&(t=n),r=0;r>>0;if("function"!=typeof e)throw new TypeError(e+" is not a function");for(arguments.length>1&&(t=n),r=new Array(s),i=0;i>>0;if("function"!=typeof e)throw new TypeError;for(var r=[],i=arguments.length>=2?arguments[1]:void 0,o=0;o>>0,i=0;if(2==arguments.length)n=arguments[1];else{for(;i=r)throw new TypeError("Reduce of empty array with no initial value");n=t[i++]}for(;i>>0;if(0===i)return-1;for(n=i-1,arguments.length>1&&(n=Number(arguments[1]),n!=n?n=0:0!==n&&n!=1/0&&n!=-1/0&&(n=(n>0||-1)*Math.floor(Math.abs(n)))),t=n>=0?Math.min(n,i-1):i-Math.abs(n);t>=0;t--)if(t in r&&r[t]===e)return t;return-1};t(Array.prototype,"lastIndexOf",c)}if(!Array.prototype.includes){var f=function(e){"use strict";if(null==this)throw new TypeError("Array.prototype.includes called on null or undefined");var n=Object(this),t=parseInt(n.length,10)||0;if(0===t)return!1;var r,i=parseInt(arguments[1],10)||0;i>=0?r=i:(r=t+i)<0&&(r=0);for(var o;r

It’s just okay. Maybe I expected too much but it did not save me much time at all with all the changes I had to make to the articles. I used it on the “readable” setting and allowed it to automatically spin paragraphs, sentences, etc. Well it was actually “readable” but not human readable, also there is option for human readable articles, but it will be not 100% unique.
Before WordAi even starts spinning, it reads the entire article to understand both "generally" what the article is about and the "specifics" as to what exactly happens in the article. This allows WordAi to create complicated paragraph and document level spins based on its deep understanding of the article. Because no other machine has this level of deep understanding, it makes your content look human written. It is even able to correctly write high quality titles by identifying what the article is talking about.

Having a continuous flow of fresh, human-readable text is the best way for your website or blog to gain search engine exposure. Content is King, as they say ... at least as important as basic search engine optimization. Thus, Spinbot can be a vital tool for anyone who wants to market their website or product online as quickly and efficiently as possible. With all the unique, quality textual content you could ever want, you will quickly gain legitimate web visibility, both in terms of human readership and search engine exposure.
Looking at both spinner’s spun articles, they both seem to generate spun content that looks pretty good. Both have some grammar issues I would correct if I was posting it on a high tier 1 site, but overall SpinnerChief produced better content. Not sure if WordAi is being overly aggressive on the spins at the cost of quality. This test is very hard to call. If you go by raw numbers, SpinnerChief won. I want to leave this up to you to decide which one won. Winner none – draw!
Conclusion, if it boils down to speed, money and most readable spun content SpinnerChief Ultimate is what you want. If you’ve just got to have a web based solutions then WordAi is what you want. Remember we are using the cream of the crop here Word Ai Turing Edition and Spinner Chief III Ultimate. I believe the majority of users will opt for SpinnerChief Ultimate over WordAi Turning due to WordAi’s cost.
As we all know, Yahoo!Answers is the largest world’s question and answer community. You can attract targeted customers to your site and generate sales with AnswersChief. AnsweriChief can automatically handle all your Yahoo!Answers work.We have tested, AnswersChief fully,we know it can bring customers for you every day, and it can become a 24 -hour non-stopping money-making machine.
Don't you hate it when your synonyms make no {sense|perception}? Don't settle for the "content garbage" that most spinners vomit out. WordAi can tell subtle differences between words and makes sure each synonym it picks makes complete sense. This gives you articles that are automatically readable, without you needing to spend countless hours fixing them up!
Not so long ago there lived a boy. He blue eyes with blond hair as yellow as gold. The young boy was smaller than average fragile, but his mind was swift much like the wind. He could calculate the outcome from a situation within the blink of the eye. But that was not his biggest talent. No. His biggest talent was perception. The son could understand and perceive anything quicker than anyone he’d ever met. Then, he fell crazy about a lovely princess. She’d magnetic green eyes and light brown hair. He loved her quite definitely and then she loved him back even more. There were only 1 problem – the young lad was the son of your blacksmith. The princess’s father would never allow her to marry an easy son of a blacksmith. On the other hand love was too strong. In a single fell swoop, the young boy raised an army of undead and commenced a rebellion to overthrow the evil king who didn’t trust soul mates. After months of struggling with the armies of his beloved’s father, the young lad was assassinated as well as the war was over. No songs were sang.
But it is the most important that the spun text, especially with version 2.0 usually passes CS test, and Google cannot even see it as spun content. Such as content can be used for links building as well as on money sites and qualitity is pretty good, as you saw in the example. It is much better than other article spinners with similar pricing as they do not get the right meaning of each and every word, so the rewrites sometimes looks funny/strange. It is of course much better than any free article spinner/rewriter I have tried.
It looks like the creators of Spin Rewriter 9 .0 have really put a lot of work into creating a piece of software that creates readable content. However, Google isn’t stupid and there are a lot of things that can go wrong when you are trying to “manipulate” Google into giving you more traffic. Google hates spam, badly written content and duplicate content. These are all things that Spin Rewriter 9 .0 is capable of creating. You simply can’t trust a piece of software to write content for you in my opinion.
×