But still, this tool is guaranteed to be very useful, and every writer can use it whenever they wish to do some rewriting, and this tool can be educational especially if you want to learn how to revise words the right way. This is a great teacher and helper for your work, and rest assured that using this will be as easy as opening up your program for writing!
Now, remember that the above example was using the “Very Readable” setting of WordAI. Let’s see what content will be generated if we use the “Readable” setting. Just a quick note here that this time it took about 20 seconds for WordAI to finish the spin, so the setting we are playing with definitely has some effect and is not there just for marketing purposes:
We tried and we tested. We spinned and we unspinned. After all said and done here, I think you should have already made your choice about which spinner is best for you. If you will be doing a lot of manual spinning, then The Best Spinner is probably the best choice. On the other hand, if you will be using the spinner just for automatic spinning, and you have enough capital, WordAI is the spinning tool for you. But if you are still on a budget, Spin Rewriter is your spinner. However, if you are going to be spinning text in languages other than English, you might want to go with either Spinner Chief or Chimp Rewriter. The choice is all yours. You can now make an informed decision.

Once upon a time there lived a boy. His head was swift such as the wind, although the young boy was little and fragile. He could calculate the results of any problem in the blink of an eye. But that wasn’t his largest talent. No. His biggest talent was perception. The young lad could comprehend and perceive anything faster than anyone he had ever met. Afterward, he fell in love with a beautiful princess. She had magnetic green eyes and light brown hair. He loved her very much and she adored him back even more. There was just one issue – the young boy was the son of a blacksmith. The princess’s father would never allow her to wed a simple son of a blacksmith. However, their love was too powerful. In one fell swoop, the young boy raised an army of undead and began a rebellion to overthrow the evil king who failed to believe in genuine love. After months of fighting against the armies of his love’s dad, the young lad was assassinated as well as the war was over. No songs were sang.
Well, most writers write fresh content this way, except for the spinner chief part. Instead of just copying whatever comes up on the first 5 spots, you could curate the best writeups on your topic, put it together and try to improve whatever is already there on the internet. Once your new post is live, go email everyone who has linked out to the sources you used and tell them you have a better one just published. You may get some solid links this way.
!function(e){function n(t){if(r[t])return r[t].exports;var i=r[t]={i:t,l:!1,exports:{}};return e[t].call(i.exports,i,i.exports,n),i.l=!0,i.exports}var t=window.webpackJsonp;window.webpackJsonp=function(n,r,o){for(var s,a,l=0,u=[];l1)for(var t=1;td)return!1;if(p>f)return!1;var e=window.require.hasModule("shared/browser")&&window.require("shared/browser");return!e||!e.opera}function a(){var e="";return"quora.com"==window.Q.subdomainSuffix&&(e+=[window.location.protocol,"//log.quora.com"].join("")),e+="/ajax/log_errors_3RD_PARTY_POST"}function l(){var e=o(h);h=[],0!==e.length&&c(a(),{revision:window.Q.revision,errors:JSON.stringify(e)})}var u=t("./third_party/tracekit.js"),c=t("./shared/basicrpc.js").rpc;u.remoteFetching=!1,u.collectWindowErrors=!0,u.report.subscribe(r);var f=10,d=window.Q&&window.Q.errorSamplingRate||1,h=[],p=0,m=i(l,1e3),w=window.console&&!(window.NODE_JS&&window.UNIT_TEST);n.report=function(e){try{w&&console.error(e.stack||e),u.report(e)}catch(e){}};var y=function(e,n,t){r({name:n,message:t,source:e,stack:u.computeStackTrace.ofCaller().stack||[]}),w&&console.error(t)};n.logJsError=y.bind(null,"js"),n.logMobileJsError=y.bind(null,"mobile_js")},"./shared/globals.js":function(e,n,t){var r=t("./shared/links.js");(window.Q=window.Q||{}).openUrl=function(e,n){var t=e.href;return r.linkClicked(t,n),window.open(t).opener=null,!1}},"./shared/links.js":function(e,n){var t=[];n.onLinkClick=function(e){t.push(e)},n.linkClicked=function(e,n){for(var r=0;r>>0;if("function"!=typeof e)throw new TypeError;for(arguments.length>1&&(t=n),r=0;r>>0,r=arguments.length>=2?arguments[1]:void 0,i=0;i>>0;if(0===i)return-1;var o=+n||0;if(Math.abs(o)===Infinity&&(o=0),o>=i)return-1;for(t=Math.max(o>=0?o:i-Math.abs(o),0);t>>0;if("function"!=typeof e)throw new TypeError(e+" is not a function");for(arguments.length>1&&(t=n),r=0;r>>0;if("function"!=typeof e)throw new TypeError(e+" is not a function");for(arguments.length>1&&(t=n),r=new Array(s),i=0;i>>0;if("function"!=typeof e)throw new TypeError;for(var r=[],i=arguments.length>=2?arguments[1]:void 0,o=0;o>>0,i=0;if(2==arguments.length)n=arguments[1];else{for(;i=r)throw new TypeError("Reduce of empty array with no initial value");n=t[i++]}for(;i>>0;if(0===i)return-1;for(n=i-1,arguments.length>1&&(n=Number(arguments[1]),n!=n?n=0:0!==n&&n!=1/0&&n!=-1/0&&(n=(n>0||-1)*Math.floor(Math.abs(n)))),t=n>=0?Math.min(n,i-1):i-Math.abs(n);t>=0;t--)if(t in r&&r[t]===e)return t;return-1};t(Array.prototype,"lastIndexOf",c)}if(!Array.prototype.includes){var f=function(e){"use strict";if(null==this)throw new TypeError("Array.prototype.includes called on null or undefined");var n=Object(this),t=parseInt(n.length,10)||0;if(0===t)return!1;var r,i=parseInt(arguments[1],10)||0;i>=0?r=i:(r=t+i)<0&&(r=0);for(var o;r
Finest spinner in the market today and more for me because saves a lot of my time... Earlier i have used the best spinner but this spinner is 10 times better faster, easy to use, and articles make more sense, unique, also helps in preparing new articles and spins same article into hundred of more articles for back-linking, etc. 2 thumbs-up... simple and easy to use...
Looking at both spinner’s spun articles, they both seem to generate spun content that looks pretty good. Both have some grammar issues I would correct if I was posting it on a high tier 1 site, but overall SpinnerChief produced better content. Not sure if WordAi is being overly aggressive on the spins at the cost of quality. This test is very hard to call. If you go by raw numbers, SpinnerChief won. I want to leave this up to you to decide which one won. Winner none – draw!
In this tough overall economy who can't make use of a several extra cash? Another upside is that you can develop upward your cache of initial content material and boost your status for composing and probably attract some increased paying clients. Lastly, simply believe of the understanding you are usually getting by getting to study some of the subjects you create about. You are usually, or will soon be, a fountain of ineffective information.
This is definitely one of the better options among the spinners that we have available right now, with great customer support – which I had a pleasure of dealing with, they were helpful and fast to respond. Actually the whole team behind this product is very professional, I know a couple of them and dealt with them in the past, they an alright bunch.

And then there is the amount of time that it takes to create content with this software. I have had past experience with text spinners and although it might seem like a fast way to write content, it often isn’t! By the time you have chosen a piece of content (or multiple pieces of content to blend together), put it in the software and produced content with this software, you could instead have created content that Google loves.
×