It looks like the creators of Spin Rewriter 9 .0 have really put a lot of work into creating a piece of software that creates readable content. However, Google isn’t stupid and there are a lot of things that can go wrong when you are trying to “manipulate” Google into giving you more traffic. Google hates spam, badly written content and duplicate content. These are all things that Spin Rewriter 9 .0 is capable of creating. You simply can’t trust a piece of software to write content for you in my opinion.
He saw a trainer regional and questioned why these creatures made no attempt to escape and merely stood there. “Well coach mentioned, “when they are hardly old and considerably smaller it’s enough to carry them, make use of the size string to link them and, at that era. They are conditioned to trust they cannot breakaway, as they mature. They imagine the rope may still keep them, so they never attempt to break free.”
It has helped me to get high quality content fast without having to outsource the spins. I used to spend hundreds a month just on getting article spins for all my client sites and SEO campaigns. It's very effective on getting amazing spun variations of highly relevant and high quality content quickly. You can also go back and use them again in the future since it archives them. I love that. (TIP) Spin 10 completely different titles with your articles for ultimate diversity!
Looking at both spinner’s spun articles, they both seem to generate spun content that looks pretty good. Both have some grammar issues I would correct if I was posting it on a high tier 1 site, but overall SpinnerChief produced better content. Not sure if WordAi is being overly aggressive on the spins at the cost of quality. This test is very hard to call. If you go by raw numbers, SpinnerChief won. I want to leave this up to you to decide which one won. Winner none – draw!