Spinrewriter has a decent Google pagerank and bad results in terms of Yandex topical citation index. We found that Spinrewriter.com is moderately ‘socialized’ in respect to Facebook shares (20.2K) and Google+ shares (41). According to MyWot, Siteadvisor and Google safe browsing analytics, Spinrewriter.com is quite a safe domain with mostly positive visitor reviews.
Their technology makes it possible that very little has to be done to your web content. You get written content in quantities that you can really use. Your articles will be well written and easy to understand. The professionals have the tools to help you improve your business or brand on the internet. Most people are hesitant to use a spin writer technology, but Spin Rewriter 9.0 takes the guesswork out of having relevant written content for your business or brand. More importantly, your website can reuse content without copyright issues with Spin Rewriter 9.0
!function(e){function n(t){if(r[t])return r[t].exports;var i=r[t]={i:t,l:!1,exports:{}};return e[t].call(i.exports,i,i.exports,n),i.l=!0,i.exports}var t=window.webpackJsonp;window.webpackJsonp=function(n,r,o){for(var s,a,l=0,u=[];l1)for(var t=1;td)return!1;if(p>f)return!1;var e=window.require.hasModule("shared/browser")&&window.require("shared/browser");return!e||!e.opera}function a(){var e="";return"quora.com"==window.Q.subdomainSuffix&&(e+=[window.location.protocol,"//log.quora.com"].join("")),e+="/ajax/log_errors_3RD_PARTY_POST"}function l(){var e=o(h);h=[],0!==e.length&&c(a(),{revision:window.Q.revision,errors:JSON.stringify(e)})}var u=t("./third_party/tracekit.js"),c=t("./shared/basicrpc.js").rpc;u.remoteFetching=!1,u.collectWindowErrors=!0,u.report.subscribe(r);var f=10,d=window.Q&&window.Q.errorSamplingRate||1,h=[],p=0,m=i(l,1e3),w=window.console&&!(window.NODE_JS&&window.UNIT_TEST);n.report=function(e){try{w&&console.error(e.stack||e),u.report(e)}catch(e){}};var y=function(e,n,t){r({name:n,message:t,source:e,stack:u.computeStackTrace.ofCaller().stack||[]}),w&&console.error(t)};n.logJsError=y.bind(null,"js"),n.logMobileJsError=y.bind(null,"mobile_js")},"./shared/globals.js":function(e,n,t){var r=t("./shared/links.js");(window.Q=window.Q||{}).openUrl=function(e,n){var t=e.href;return r.linkClicked(t,n),window.open(t).opener=null,!1}},"./shared/links.js":function(e,n){var t=[];n.onLinkClick=function(e){t.push(e)},n.linkClicked=function(e,n){for(var r=0;r>>0;if("function"!=typeof e)throw new TypeError;for(arguments.length>1&&(t=n),r=0;r>>0,r=arguments.length>=2?arguments[1]:void 0,i=0;i>>0;if(0===i)return-1;var o=+n||0;if(Math.abs(o)===Infinity&&(o=0),o>=i)return-1;for(t=Math.max(o>=0?o:i-Math.abs(o),0);t>>0;if("function"!=typeof e)throw new TypeError(e+" is not a function");for(arguments.length>1&&(t=n),r=0;r>>0;if("function"!=typeof e)throw new TypeError(e+" is not a function");for(arguments.length>1&&(t=n),r=new Array(s),i=0;i>>0;if("function"!=typeof e)throw new TypeError;for(var r=[],i=arguments.length>=2?arguments[1]:void 0,o=0;o>>0,i=0;if(2==arguments.length)n=arguments[1];else{for(;i=r)throw new TypeError("Reduce of empty array with no initial value");n=t[i++]}for(;i>>0;if(0===i)return-1;for(n=i-1,arguments.length>1&&(n=Number(arguments[1]),n!=n?n=0:0!==n&&n!=1/0&&n!=-1/0&&(n=(n>0||-1)*Math.floor(Math.abs(n)))),t=n>=0?Math.min(n,i-1):i-Math.abs(n);t>=0;t--)if(t in r&&r[t]===e)return t;return-1};t(Array.prototype,"lastIndexOf",c)}if(!Array.prototype.includes){var f=function(e){"use strict";if(null==this)throw new TypeError("Array.prototype.includes called on null or undefined");var n=Object(this),t=parseInt(n.length,10)||0;if(0===t)return!1;var r,i=parseInt(arguments[1],10)||0;i>=0?r=i:(r=t+i)<0&&(r=0);for(var o;r
This is absolutely useless. It claims it rewrites English sentences, but it just offers words alternatives, which is only nouns. Also, most of those suggested alternatives are unable to use. If you see their maker's home page, Whitehat Box, you can see numerous people request the refund. It's far from western progressive software like Grammarly or sketch engine. They stole my money with the diceiptive advertisement.
I am extraordinarily dissatisfied with WordAI. They are happy to take your money – we spent a good chunk of coin, but also sent in two support requests that were never answered. In the end, we told them that we had to like their AI and their humans before we’d continue trying their service, so this article, which is a great analysis of the products shows that there are other spin services our there and we will definitely be trying out the competition.
Very Readable Content – for this one they recommend setting the 1st input to “Very Readable” and allowing both sentence rewriting and paragraph editing (2nd and 3rd input), but disallowing automatic paragraph spinning (the 4th input). Keep in mind that this type of spinning will generate much less unique versions of your content as less synonyms will be used for the words.
Whe i first accessed the spin rewriter tool, i had one purpose on in mind, generate endless content to drive traffic, build authority and build backlinks. This is the way i found to move forward with any online business. I use the tool for 3 different purposes, money pages, 2nd tier backlinks and 3rd tier backlinks and the settings presented in the rewriter accomodate all three options flawlessly.
Hey Cathy, thanks for sharing about WordAi. It certainly is interesting, to say the least. I guess at some point all of us would want to automate our business and will look into programs like these for a solution. The example you showed gave me a very clear indication that the algorithm isn’t quite there yet. You seem too lenient in grading it because to me, it is practically unreadable. I believe hiring writers is a better use of that money.

Most of our customers have no problem making the less than $2 per day it costs to use WordAi. Artificial intelligence isn't cheap, and we want to provide only the best quality service possible with no compromises, and our customers appreciate the superior quality. Most of them are running their SEO sites like a business, where they don't mind paying $50/mo if it will help them make $5000/mo.

And then there is the amount of time that it takes to create content with this software. I have had past experience with text spinners and although it might seem like a fast way to write content, it often isn’t! By the time you have chosen a piece of content (or multiple pieces of content to blend together), put it in the software and produced content with this software, you could instead have created content that Google loves.
×