That’s really weird. I have tested WordAI and Spin Rewriter with Copyscape and the results were always 80%+ uniquness, even 90%+. I don’t know how u spun the content to achieve such low results, but this is definitely way too bad. As for the block spinning, I have to be honest, this is the first time I’m hearing of it and I will have to check it out when I have a bit of time, but generally, yes, in the best case scenario, you would manually touch your Tier 1 content to make it 100% human readable and as unique as possible. For lower tiers, you can do pretty much anything, but again, the better quality of content, the better results you will have. That’s in my opinion and experience.
Spin Rewriter 9.0 allows their users to have hundreds of articles of similar high quality in a short amount of time. They have updated the ENL Semantic Spinning engine to include synonyms and sentence structure variants. Their article software that is spinning is of the best in the market and they have kept their costs affordable. Website professionals are using spin Rewriter. High profile customers have stated; the Rewriter tool is used with a marketing budget as a savings model for any business.
For a blogger who has to publish multiple blogs on daily basis, it is tough for them to write unique content, especially when writing on same topics. In that case, spin bot tool could be used to avoid self-plagiarism and to maintain the quality on blog posts. As spinbot change synonym automatically but you can pick the most relevant synonym using out tool.
Imo it is not possible for google to detect properly spun content, it is not worth computing power it requires. They can do this using ngrams for example, but it is uses a lot of queries. And for example article spinner I coded beats this algo, so google cant detect that the content is spun. Manual spinning is also good but it takes more than 30 minutes per article.
Start with a quality article. This means a unique topic or viewpoint on a very specific topic. The information must be valuable to a human reader. At this point in time, it is not possible for any software program to produce content that is engaging. If you start out with a low-quality article, the chances are high that the alternate versions are going to be even worse.
Its guaranteed that this tool will make rewriting jobs a lot easier than before because you can finally take a rest and let the software do the job for you. This is a wonderful tool indeed, and rest assured that everything will be perfect as long as you only use this tool for the sake of rewriting articles and not for changing a content thats the same as the article that you need to write and not rewrite. Expect that you will be able to make things a lot unique for the rewrites that you do with the aid of this tool because you now know how big its database is.
Hey Cathy, thanks for sharing about WordAi. It certainly is interesting, to say the least. I guess at some point all of us would want to automate our business and will look into programs like these for a solution. The example you showed gave me a very clear indication that the algorithm isn’t quite there yet. You seem too lenient in grading it because to me, it is practically unreadable. I believe hiring writers is a better use of that money.
Once upon a time there lived a boy. He had blue eyes with blond hair as yellow as gold. The young boy was small and fragile, but his mind was swift like the wind. He could calculate the outcome of any situation in the blink of an eye. But that was not his biggest talent. No. His biggest talent was perception. The young boy could understand and perceive anything faster than anyone he had ever met. Then, he fell in love with a beautiful princess. She had magnetic green eyes and light brown hair. He loved her very much and she loved him back even more. There was only one problem – the young boy was the son of a blacksmith. The princess’s father would never allow her to marry a simple son of a blacksmith. But their love was too strong. In one fell swoop, the young boy raised an army of undead and started a rebellion to overthrow the evil king who did not believe in true love. After months of fighting against the armies of his beloved’s father, the young boy was assassinated and the war was over. No songs were sang.
Cost – WordAi Turing at the time of this writing is a monthly charge of $49.95, while SpinnerChief III Ultimate is a one time purchase of $177 or $67 a year. But it’s not entire black and white to add insult to injury WordAi has a usage cap on the how many word you can spin per billing cycle. Here is an excerpt form their page “250,000 words for the “Turing Spinner” for a billing cycle you will be charged overage fees.”. So if you go over that amount WordAi will bill you extra. Spinner Chief Ultimate does not have any usage limitations when using the desktop client. Hands down SpinnerChief III Ultimate won this.
Quality readable content is key here. Google, for example, will recognize that people are leaving your site soon after arriving if they perceive that your site or blog is full of junk content. This is called "bounce rate." If your bounce rate is high, then people are quickly leaving your site. But for the sake of your business, to build your online reputation and brand, you want people to visit your site, stay for a while, and then keep revisiting over the long term.