A website with lots of unique and human-readable content is going to give you the best ROI. The more quality readable content your website has, the more exposure it will get from major search engines such as Google & Yahoo. But creating unique content takes time as you first need to develop content creation strategies and then you need some hours to write a full SEO optimized content. How great it would be if you can produce quality content within minutes! Yes, it's possible with the help of this free Article Rewriter Tool developed by SeoToolStation. 
It is a simple process where the user will simply copy and paste their article into the text box. The spinner will do the rest as it produces an entirely new article on the spot. Users are also able to include words that should be ignored by the spinner. This is in case you have specific keywords that should not be taken out. This is a fantastic tool for those who are on the go and need quality content right away. Instead of spending hours on producing content and/or spending money outsourcing to writers, it is easier to employ this spinner instead.
"I have been using Spinner Chief for about 2 months now and find it to be the best spinner that I have used. Of the many unique features Spinner Chief has, but I think the Super Replace feature is my favorite and is totally unique to Spinner Chief. I have used it exclusively to product content for my site, BuyMazuGold.com, and has saved me a lot of time and effort. I highly recommend this product and look forward to the new updates."

Cost – WordAi Turing at the time of this writing is a monthly charge of $49.95, while SpinnerChief III Ultimate is a one time purchase of $177 or $67 a year. But it’s not entire black and white to add insult to injury WordAi has a usage cap on the how many word you can spin per billing cycle. Here is an excerpt form their page “250,000 words for the “Turing Spinner” for a billing cycle you will be charged overage fees.”. So if you go over that amount WordAi will bill you extra. Spinner Chief Ultimate does not have any usage limitations when using the desktop client. Hands down SpinnerChief III Ultimate won this.


Looking at both spinner’s spun articles, they both seem to generate spun content that looks pretty good. Both have some grammar issues I would correct if I was posting it on a high tier 1 site, but overall SpinnerChief produced better content. Not sure if WordAi is being overly aggressive on the spins at the cost of quality. This test is very hard to call. If you go by raw numbers, SpinnerChief won. I want to leave this up to you to decide which one won. Winner none – draw!
As you can see, WordAI is a lot more loose with the meaning of the text and uses synonyms wherever it can in order to produce the most unique content possible – this one is calculated at 98% uniqueness. Again, the purpose of such content should be for the lower tiers where you would need a higher quantity of links with not that high quality content.
Never let your audience guess what you are trying to say, your writing should literally speak for itself. When your content has too many errors, it becomes difficult to read and understand. Although, one or two errors can be skipped by readers, but glaring grammatical errors can minimize the impact of your content. Also, it can make your writing difficult to read and digest.
You do not have to bring about any sort of the change in the structure of the paragraph sufficiently. It would be such an easy way out if you will be jotting down with the notes and explain out with some of the main points into the paragraph. You should be hence rewriting all by means of using the notes and not the original one. Proofreading the document as about 2-3 times definitely.
Looking at both spinner’s spun articles, they both seem to generate spun content that looks pretty good. Both have some grammar issues I would correct if I was posting it on a high tier 1 site, but overall SpinnerChief produced better content. Not sure if WordAi is being overly aggressive on the spins at the cost of quality. This test is very hard to call. If you go by raw numbers, SpinnerChief won. I want to leave this up to you to decide which one won. Winner none – draw! 

He inquired why these creatures just stood there and made no attempt to get away and saw a trainer nearby. “Well,” trainer said, “when they’re extremely young and much smaller we use the same size rope to tie them and, at that age, it is enough to hold them. As they grow up, they may be conditioned to believe they cannot break away. They believe the rope can still hold them, so they never make an effort to break free.”


There is also the option to spin capitalized words (assumed to be proper nouns) as well as leave any number of words unchanged, depending on whatever you enter into the "ignore" field, separated by commas. You also have the option to only keep the sentences that were altered a minimum percentage, as indicated by the "Keep Sentences that Changed" option.
He observed a regional and questioned why these pets built no attempt to getaway and only stood there. “Well, instructor that is ” stated, “when they’re much and hardly old smaller we it’s enough to hold them, utilize the same dimension string to wrap them and, at that age. They are conditioned to think they can not break-away while they develop. They think the string could still carry them, so they really never attempt to break free.”
Only standard WordAI spinner showed 12% match for me in Copyscape which is very good I think. Also I will add that for SPAM links in general you don’t need any quality at all. if Google crawler can’t find connection with other spinned articles – goal achieved. Sorry, but I don’t see that with expensive spinners as Copyspace shows that in plain sight.
Now, remember that the above example was using the “Very Readable” setting of WordAI. Let’s see what content will be generated if we use the “Readable” setting. Just a quick note here that this time it took about 20 seconds for WordAI to finish the spin, so the setting we are playing with definitely has some effect and is not there just for marketing purposes:
Imo it is not possible for google to detect properly spun content, it is not worth computing power it requires. They can do this using ngrams for example, but it is uses a lot of queries. And for example article spinner I coded beats this algo, so google cant detect that the content is spun. Manual spinning is also good but it takes more than 30 minutes per article.
×