Select the best quality text/content from online, check it, is it suited with your context? Proper selection is too much important for delivering better new one. Get the content from there! And place it on the editor of SEO WAGON Article rewriter tool. Hey, click on Next and see the effects, the engine will read it and gives you options to rewrite as per your choice, choose appropriate synonyms, or you write your own word. There are thousands of synonyms of each word in our dictionary, let’s go for the quickest way of generating article.

After rewriting and keeping the dynamics of the writing same, our tool passes it through a plagiarism checker. This ensures that the legal standard of plagiarism is maintained after rewriting the article. After all this process, a final rewritten form is presented to you. All this process may require some time depending upon the nature and length of the article to be rewritten.
Google is getting VERY good at catching spun content so you'd better be talented at manual spins. If they DO catch you, of course they'll spank you... and hard. So anything you use spun content on is inherently AT RISK. Worse yet... Google gets better at finding spun/poor content every year. So in the longrun you're screwed. I'd weight your other options and see if you couldn't find a cheaper source for manually hand written content.

Manual spinnig is still needed when you want to create ultimate spun and readable articles. You must spin paragraphs and sentences if you want to create the ultimate spun article, it used to be a pain to spin huge articles in paragraph and sentence mode, the nested text always made it diffcult to find the right sentence. But now, with SpinnerChief 5's spin tree function, everything becomes clear and easy! All paragraphs and sentences are organized very well, you can locate, modify and spin them easily.
Some favorable aspects to writing articles and marketing them on the net is that you really get to supplement your monthly income. In this challenging economy who can't use a few additional bucks? Another upside is that one may build up your cache of first content and increase your reputation for writing and possibly pull some higher paying customers. Lastly, merely think about the information you're gaining by having to research some of the subjects you write about. You're, or will shortly be, a fountain of worthless tips.
In this tough overall economy who can't make use of a several extra cash? Another upside is that you can develop upward your cache of initial content material and boost your status for composing and probably attract some increased paying clients. Lastly, simply believe of the understanding you are usually getting by getting to study some of the subjects you create about. You are usually, or will soon be, a fountain of ineffective information.
Cost – WordAi Turing at the time of this writing is a monthly charge of $49.95, while SpinnerChief III Ultimate is a one time purchase of $177 or $67 a year. But it’s not entire black and white to add insult to injury WordAi has a usage cap on the how many word you can spin per billing cycle. Here is an excerpt form their page “250,000 words for the “Turing Spinner” for a billing cycle you will be charged overage fees.”. So if you go over that amount WordAi will bill you extra. Spinner Chief Ultimate does not have any usage limitations when using the desktop client. Hands down SpinnerChief III Ultimate won this.
This is absolutely useless. It claims it rewrites English sentences, but it just offers words alternatives, which is only nouns. Also, most of those suggested alternatives are unable to use. If you see their maker's home page, Whitehat Box, you can see numerous people request the refund. It's far from western progressive software like Grammarly or sketch engine. They stole my money with the diceiptive advertisement.

That’s really weird. I have tested WordAI and Spin Rewriter with Copyscape and the results were always 80%+ uniquness, even 90%+. I don’t know how u spun the content to achieve such low results, but this is definitely way too bad. As for the block spinning, I have to be honest, this is the first time I’m hearing of it and I will have to check it out when I have a bit of time, but generally, yes, in the best case scenario, you would manually touch your Tier 1 content to make it 100% human readable and as unique as possible. For lower tiers, you can do pretty much anything, but again, the better quality of content, the better results you will have. That’s in my opinion and experience.
Not sure about version 1, but I'm testing version 2 right now and I have to say it's the best auto spinner I've seen bar none. The content is actually extremely readable and probably better than the manual spins a lot of people do out there. However, some of the content doesn't pass copyscape so make sure you play around with the settings. Minor edits should do the trick. I'm on the trial now but seriously thinking of keeping the Turing plan for my Tier 1 content.
Before WordAi even starts spinning, it reads the entire article to understand both "generally" what the article is about and the "specifics" as to what exactly happens in the article. This allows WordAi to create complicated paragraph and document level spins based on its deep understanding of the article. Because no other machine has this level of deep understanding, it makes your content look human written. It is even able to correctly write high quality titles by identifying what the article is talking about.
This software serves a purpose and fills a gap in the market. Many people will buy this software as they believe its a fast way of creating content. Others will buy the software so that it interacts with another piece of software like Article Marketing Robot for instance. No doubt this software will make many thousands in profits. Personally, I won’t be getting involved and here’s why…
Nobody is immune to spelling and grammatical errors, not even me. It doesn't matter how many times you proofread your content, sometimes an error slips through the cracks. But, too many errors in your writing are bad for article writing services business and can also hurt your reputation over time. If customers are annoyed by poor grammar on social media or on a small blog post, just think about how they will feel if they receive an email or eBook laced with these errors.
!function(n,t){function r(e,n){return Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(e,n)}function i(e){return void 0===e}if(n){var o={},s=n.TraceKit,a=[].slice,l="?";o.noConflict=function(){return n.TraceKit=s,o},o.wrap=function(e){function n(){try{return e.apply(this,arguments)}catch(e){throw o.report(e),e}}return n},o.report=function(){function e(e){l(),h.push(e)}function t(e){for(var n=h.length-1;n>=0;--n)h[n]===e&&h.splice(n,1)}function i(e,n){var t=null;if(!n||o.collectWindowErrors){for(var i in h)if(r(h,i))try{h[i].apply(null,[e].concat(a.call(arguments,2)))}catch(e){t=e}if(t)throw t}}function s(e,n,t,r,s){var a=null;if(w)o.computeStackTrace.augmentStackTraceWithInitialElement(w,n,t,e),u();else if(s)a=o.computeStackTrace(s),i(a,!0);else{var l={url:n,line:t,column:r};l.func=o.computeStackTrace.guessFunctionName(l.url,l.line),l.context=o.computeStackTrace.gatherContext(l.url,l.line),a={mode:"onerror",message:e,stack:[l]},i(a,!0)}return!!f&&f.apply(this,arguments)}function l(){!0!==d&&(f=n.onerror,n.onerror=s,d=!0)}function u(){var e=w,n=p;p=null,w=null,m=null,i.apply(null,[e,!1].concat(n))}function c(e){if(w){if(m===e)return;u()}var t=o.computeStackTrace(e);throw w=t,m=e,p=a.call(arguments,1),n.setTimeout(function(){m===e&&u()},t.incomplete?2e3:0),e}var f,d,h=[],p=null,m=null,w=null;return c.subscribe=e,c.unsubscribe=t,c}(),o.computeStackTrace=function(){function e(e){if(!o.remoteFetching)return"";try{var t=function(){try{return new n.XMLHttpRequest}catch(e){return new n.ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP")}},r=t();return r.open("GET",e,!1),r.send(""),r.responseText}catch(e){return""}}function t(t){if("string"!=typeof t)return[];if(!r(j,t)){var i="",o="";try{o=n.document.domain}catch(e){}var s=/(.*)\:\/\/([^:\/]+)([:\d]*)\/{0,1}([\s\S]*)/.exec(t);s&&s[2]===o&&(i=e(t)),j[t]=i?i.split("\n"):[]}return j[t]}function s(e,n){var r,o=/function ([^(]*)\(([^)]*)\)/,s=/['"]?([0-9A-Za-z$_]+)['"]?\s*[:=]\s*(function|eval|new Function)/,a="",u=10,c=t(e);if(!c.length)return l;for(var f=0;f0?s:null}function u(e){return e.replace(/[\-\[\]{}()*+?.,\\\^$|#]/g,"\\$&")}function c(e){return u(e).replace("<","(?:<|<)").replace(">","(?:>|>)").replace("&","(?:&|&)").replace('"','(?:"|")').replace(/\s+/g,"\\s+")}function f(e,n){for(var r,i,o=0,s=n.length;or&&(i=s.exec(o[r]))?i.index:null}function h(e){if(!i(n&&n.document)){for(var t,r,o,s,a=[n.location.href],l=n.document.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=""+e,h=/^function(?:\s+([\w$]+))?\s*\(([\w\s,]*)\)\s*\{\s*(\S[\s\S]*\S)\s*\}\s*$/,p=/^function on([\w$]+)\s*\(event\)\s*\{\s*(\S[\s\S]*\S)\s*\}\s*$/,m=0;m]+)>|([^\)]+))\((.*)\))? in (.*):\s*$/i,o=n.split("\n"),l=[],u=0;u=0&&(g.line=v+x.substring(0,j).split("\n").length)}}}else if(o=d.exec(i[y])){var _=n.location.href.replace(/#.*$/,""),T=new RegExp(c(i[y+1])),E=f(T,[_]);g={url:_,func:"",args:[],line:E?E.line:o[1],column:null}}if(g){g.func||(g.func=s(g.url,g.line));var k=a(g.url,g.line),A=k?k[Math.floor(k.length/2)]:null;k&&A.replace(/^\s*/,"")===i[y+1].replace(/^\s*/,"")?g.context=k:g.context=[i[y+1]],h.push(g)}}return h.length?{mode:"multiline",name:e.name,message:i[0],stack:h}:null}function y(e,n,t,r){var i={url:n,line:t};if(i.url&&i.line){e.incomplete=!1,i.func||(i.func=s(i.url,i.line)),i.context||(i.context=a(i.url,i.line));var o=/ '([^']+)' /.exec(r);if(o&&(i.column=d(o[1],i.url,i.line)),e.stack.length>0&&e.stack[0].url===i.url){if(e.stack[0].line===i.line)return!1;if(!e.stack[0].line&&e.stack[0].func===i.func)return e.stack[0].line=i.line,e.stack[0].context=i.context,!1}return e.stack.unshift(i),e.partial=!0,!0}return e.incomplete=!0,!1}function g(e,n){for(var t,r,i,a=/function\s+([_$a-zA-Z\xA0-\uFFFF][_$a-zA-Z0-9\xA0-\uFFFF]*)?\s*\(/i,u=[],c={},f=!1,p=g.caller;p&&!f;p=p.caller)if(p!==v&&p!==o.report){if(r={url:null,func:l,args:[],line:null,column:null},p.name?r.func=p.name:(t=a.exec(p.toString()))&&(r.func=t[1]),"undefined"==typeof r.func)try{r.func=t.input.substring(0,t.input.indexOf("{"))}catch(e){}if(i=h(p)){r.url=i.url,r.line=i.line,r.func===l&&(r.func=s(r.url,r.line));var m=/ '([^']+)' /.exec(e.message||e.description);m&&(r.column=d(m[1],i.url,i.line))}c[""+p]?f=!0:c[""+p]=!0,u.push(r)}n&&u.splice(0,n);var w={mode:"callers",name:e.name,message:e.message,stack:u};return y(w,e.sourceURL||e.fileName,e.line||e.lineNumber,e.message||e.description),w}function v(e,n){var t=null;n=null==n?0:+n;try{if(t=m(e))return t}catch(e){if(x)throw e}try{if(t=p(e))return t}catch(e){if(x)throw e}try{if(t=w(e))return t}catch(e){if(x)throw e}try{if(t=g(e,n+1))return t}catch(e){if(x)throw e}return{mode:"failed"}}function b(e){e=1+(null==e?0:+e);try{throw new Error}catch(n){return v(n,e+1)}}var x=!1,j={};return v.augmentStackTraceWithInitialElement=y,v.guessFunctionName=s,v.gatherContext=a,v.ofCaller=b,v.getSource=t,v}(),o.extendToAsynchronousCallbacks=function(){var e=function(e){var t=n[e];n[e]=function(){var e=a.call(arguments),n=e[0];return"function"==typeof n&&(e[0]=o.wrap(n)),t.apply?t.apply(this,e):t(e[0],e[1])}};e("setTimeout"),e("setInterval")},o.remoteFetching||(o.remoteFetching=!0),o.collectWindowErrors||(o.collectWindowErrors=!0),(!o.linesOfContext||o.linesOfContext<1)&&(o.linesOfContext=11),void 0!==e&&e.exports&&n.module!==e?e.exports=o:"function"==typeof define&&define.amd?define("TraceKit",[],o):n.TraceKit=o}}("undefined"!=typeof window?window:global)},"./webpack-loaders/expose-loader/index.js?require!./shared/require-global.js":function(e,n,t){(function(n){e.exports=n.require=t("./shared/require-global.js")}).call(n,t("../../../lib/node_modules/webpack/buildin/global.js"))}});
Its guaranteed that this tool will make rewriting jobs a lot easier than before because you can finally take a rest and let the software do the job for you. This is a wonderful tool indeed, and rest assured that everything will be perfect as long as you only use this tool for the sake of rewriting articles and not for changing a content thats the same as the article that you need to write and not rewrite. Expect that you will be able to make things a lot unique for the rewrites that you do with the aid of this tool because you now know how big its database is.
I personally love this one. It creates amazing content and is extremely affordable. We use a combination of WordAI and Spin Rewriter for our SEO projects, because these two are just an amazing combination. I think Spin Rewriter beats the “Standard Spinner” of WordAI in terms of quality and human readability, but loses to its “Turing Spinner”. So what we do is use the “Turing Spinner” for Tier 1 projects and then Spin Rewriter for the lower tiers. Sometimes we might switch them up, but it really depends a lot on the situation.
Don't you hate it when your synonyms make no {sense|perception}? Don't settle for the "content garbage" that most spinners vomit out. WordAi can tell subtle differences between words and makes sure each synonym it picks makes complete sense. This gives you articles that are automatically readable, without you needing to spend countless hours fixing them up!
It looks like the creators of Spin Rewriter 9 .0 have really put a lot of work into creating a piece of software that creates readable content. However, Google isn’t stupid and there are a lot of things that can go wrong when you are trying to “manipulate” Google into giving you more traffic. Google hates spam, badly written content and duplicate content. These are all things that Spin Rewriter 9 .0 is capable of creating. You simply can’t trust a piece of software to write content for you in my opinion.
I've ranked websites in the past with spun content, and now they are still on #1 position of google. First year (2014) google found me because my spun was really bad, many paragraphs were just copied and my position drop from #2 to around #20 after a panda update. Later I cleaned all my text with better spun (I didn't buy any article!), my ranking went up again, and with more backlinks I reached #1 and it is still there
×